1
30
1
-
http://database.ulinks.ca/files/original/53cdc8518fdf1bbc3bf8c5f34b96fbc9.pdf
722ac64b44acd0a98d8644efa1896de2
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Trent University - Community Based Research
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2008
Title
A name given to the resource
An Evaluation Report for Point in Time
Subject
The topic of the resource
Evaluation of accreditation requirements for Point in Time<br />Program Evaluation <br />Child & Youth Studies<br />Mental Health
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Lapointe, Katherine; Peters, Monica
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Point in Time<br />Host contact: Cox, Marg
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
U-Links Office and online
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Trent University
Relation
A related resource
Beyers, Chris<br />Department: International Development Studies
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
TP-582
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Haliburton County
Description
An account of the resource
An audit of all operations for Point in Time with regard to the four areas the Childrens Mental Health Organization identify as required for accreditation. These include program, staffing, governance and management.
Abstract
A summary of the resource.
Point in Time (PINT), a centre for children, youth and parents in Haliburton County, is embarking upon a journey to become accredited by Children's Mental Health Ontario (CMHO). The focus of this research is to develop recommendations for PINT on how to create an evaluation framework.
The report begins includes a brief look at background information on PINT and on the accreditation process. How the CMHO accreditation process operates, and the advantages PINT will gain by becoming accredited are also discussed. These include standards relating to program evaluation, treatment, termination, prevention, formal research, quality assurance, accountability and clinical records.
This study aims to introduce suggestions for an evaluation framework that would aid PINT not only in becoming accredited, but that would also benefit the staff at PINT by providing them with information that they could use to better their services. Recommendations based on literature reviews, case studies, and staff interactions include: to write policy relating to evaluation for every program/area; to have one staff member in charge of quality assurance; mandatory audits of clinical records files; that future planning should include client feedback such as client satisfaction questionnaires; recording client satisfaction results in a database to be used for quality assurance data; using focus groups to gather feedback; and that PINT should begin the process of setting their standards and goals, and developing indicators to measure these goals.
children
evaluation
Mental health
organizations
Social and Health Studies