"Dublin Core:Title","Dublin Core:Creator","Dublin Core:Contributor","Dublin Core:Relation","Dublin Core:Identifier","Dublin Core:Date","Dublin Core:Source","Dublin Core:Spatial Coverage","Dublin Core:Subject","Dublin Core:Description","Dublin Core:Abstract","Dublin Core:Publisher","Dublin Core:Rights","Dublin Core:Format","Dublin Core:Language","Dublin Core:Type","Dublin Core:Coverage","Dublin Core:Alternative Title","Dublin Core:Access Rights","Dublin Core:Table Of Contents","Dublin Core:Date Available","Dublin Core:Date Created","Dublin Core:Date Accepted","Dublin Core:Date Copyrighted","Dublin Core:Date Submitted","Dublin Core:Date Issued","Dublin Core:Date Modified","Dublin Core:Date Valid","Dublin Core:License","Dublin Core:Conforms To","Dublin Core:Has Format","Dublin Core:Has Part","Dublin Core:Has Version","Dublin Core:Is Format Of","Dublin Core:Is Part Of","Dublin Core:Is Referenced By","Dublin Core:Is Replaced By","Dublin Core:Is Required By","Dublin Core:Is Version Of","Dublin Core:References","Dublin Core:Replaces","Dublin Core:Requires","Dublin Core:Extent","Dublin Core:Medium","Dublin Core:Bibliographic Citation","Dublin Core:Temporal Coverage","Dublin Core:Accrual Method","Dublin Core:Accrual Periodicity","Dublin Core:Accrual Policy","Dublin Core:Audience","Dublin Core:Audience Education Level","Dublin Core:Mediator","Dublin Core:Instructional Method","Dublin Core:Provenance","Dublin Core:Rights Holder","Item Type Metadata:Text","Item Type Metadata:Interviewer","Item Type Metadata:Location","Item Type Metadata:Local URL","Item Type Metadata:Original Format","Item Type Metadata:Physical Dimensions","Item Type Metadata:Compression","Item Type Metadata:Producer","Item Type Metadata:Director","Item Type Metadata:Number of Attachments","Item Type Metadata:Objectives","Item Type Metadata:Materials","Item Type Metadata:URL","Item Type Metadata:Participants","Item Type Metadata:Occupation","Item Type Metadata:Biographical Text","Item Type Metadata:Bibliography","Item Type Metadata:Subtitle","Item Type Metadata:Lede","Item Type Metadata:Story","Item Type Metadata:Sponsor","Item Type Metadata:Factoid","Item Type Metadata:Related Resources","Item Type Metadata:Official Website","Item Type Metadata:Street Address","Item Type Metadata:Access Information","PDF Text:Text",tags,file,itemType,collection,public,featured "An Evaluation Report for Point in Time","Lapointe, Katherine; Peters, Monica","Point in Time
Host contact: Cox, Marg","Beyers, Chris
Department: International Development Studies",TP-582,2008,"U-Links Office and online","Haliburton County","Evaluation of accreditation requirements for Point in Time
Program Evaluation 
Child & Youth Studies
Mental Health","An audit of all operations for Point in Time with regard to the four areas the Childrens Mental Health Organization identify as required for accreditation. These include program, staffing, governance and management.","Point in Time (PINT), a centre for children, youth and parents in Haliburton County, is embarking upon a journey to become accredited by Children's Mental Health Ontario (CMHO). The focus of this research is to develop recommendations for PINT on how to create an evaluation framework. The report begins includes a brief look at background information on PINT and on the accreditation process. How the CMHO accreditation process operates, and the advantages PINT will gain by becoming accredited are also discussed. These include standards relating to program evaluation, treatment, termination, prevention, formal research, quality assurance, accountability and clinical records. This study aims to introduce suggestions for an evaluation framework that would aid PINT not only in becoming accredited, but that would also benefit the staff at PINT by providing them with information that they could use to better their services. Recommendations based on literature reviews, case studies, and staff interactions include: to write policy relating to evaluation for every program/area; to have one staff member in charge of quality assurance; mandatory audits of clinical records files; that future planning should include client feedback such as client satisfaction questionnaires; recording client satisfaction results in a database to be used for quality assurance data; using focus groups to gather feedback; and that PINT should begin the process of setting their standards and goals, and developing indicators to measure these goals.","Trent University",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"children,evaluation,Mental health,organizations,Social and Health Studies",https://database.ulinks.ca/files/original/53cdc8518fdf1bbc3bf8c5f34b96fbc9.pdf,,"Trent University - Community Based Research",1,0